<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Reflecting Britain</title>
	<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ming Campbell by Quaequam Blog! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Ming stick to his promises?</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/leaders-challenge/ming-campbell/#comment-17371</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/leaders-challenge/ming-campbell/#comment-17371</guid>
					<description>[...] Over at Lib Dem Voice, I have a rant about the Lib Dems&amp;#8217; continued failure to sort out its diversity and gender balance strategy. Just to remind you: this is what Ming said he&amp;#8217;d do. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Over at Lib Dem Voice, I have a rant about the Lib Dems&#8217; continued failure to sort out its diversity and gender balance strategy. Just to remind you: this is what Ming said he&#8217;d do. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ming Campbell by Liberal Democrat Voice &#187; Opinion: Is diversity worth paying for?</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/leaders-challenge/ming-campbell/#comment-17367</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/leaders-challenge/ming-campbell/#comment-17367</guid>
					<description>[...] This is surely welcome, but Ming&amp;#8217;s moves in this area are all too rare for a leader who stated during his campaign for election that: &amp;#8220;It is clear that a positive and dynamic campaign is needed within the party to actively seek out potential women candidates, and support and encourage them through approval and selection.&amp;#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is surely welcome, but Ming&#8217;s moves in this area are all too rare for a leader who stated during his campaign for election that: &#8220;It is clear that a positive and dynamic campaign is needed within the party to actively seek out potential women candidates, and support and encourage them through approval and selection.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflecting Britain campaign launches by James Graham</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/01/24/reflecting-britain-campaign-launches/#comment-35</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/01/24/reflecting-britain-campaign-launches/#comment-35</guid>
					<description>Reflecting Britain is not campaigning for positive discrimination.  I would refer you to our FAQs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reflecting Britain is not campaigning for positive discrimination.  I would refer you to our FAQs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflecting Britain campaign launches by Jon Bloom</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/01/24/reflecting-britain-campaign-launches/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/01/24/reflecting-britain-campaign-launches/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>Positive discrimination IS divisive.  Everything should be done to ensure an adequate &amp;#38; level playing field, regardless of colour, creed, ethnicity, gender or sexual persuasion.  

A Liberal Democracy should be precisely that.  Positive discrimination is blatantly prejudiced and is against the whole ethos of the Lib Dems.

I welcome Leaders, Cllrs, MPs &amp;#38; MEPs of any persuasion, so long as they are the best person for the job, and not because some numpty has insisted that only a restricted element can apply.  (If the numpties get their way, why didnt they insist that we couldn't have a leadership election if there wasn't a female candidate, and a candidate from each and every diverse ethnic community et cetera?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positive discrimination IS divisive.  Everything should be done to ensure an adequate &amp; level playing field, regardless of colour, creed, ethnicity, gender or sexual persuasion.  </p>
<p>A Liberal Democracy should be precisely that.  Positive discrimination is blatantly prejudiced and is against the whole ethos of the Lib Dems.</p>
<p>I welcome Leaders, Cllrs, MPs &amp; MEPs of any persuasion, so long as they are the best person for the job, and not because some numpty has insisted that only a restricted element can apply.  (If the numpties get their way, why didnt they insist that we couldn&#8217;t have a leadership election if there wasn&#8217;t a female candidate, and a candidate from each and every diverse ethnic community et cetera?)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who&#8217;s your diamond? by Quaequam Blog! &#187; It&#8217;s nearly Valentines&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/diamond/#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/diamond/#comment-32</guid>
					<description>[...] So, who&amp;#8217;s you&amp;#8217;re diamond going to be? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So, who&#8217;s you&#8217;re diamond going to be? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflecting Britain campaign launches by Cllr. Rabi Martins</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/01/24/reflecting-britain-campaign-launches/#comment-31</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/01/24/reflecting-britain-campaign-launches/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>Stephen Malloary demonstrates exactly why this initiative is needed

Stephen, the issue is not that white MPs cannot represent EM minority interests or vice versa. The question is how can a group of the Party claim to be representative of the general population when its Parliamentary Group comes from from just one section of the community ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Malloary demonstrates exactly why this initiative is needed</p>
<p>Stephen, the issue is not that white MPs cannot represent EM minority interests or vice versa. The question is how can a group of the Party claim to be representative of the general population when its Parliamentary Group comes from from just one section of the community ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your views wanted! by Allan Siao Ming Witherick</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/your-views-wanted/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/your-views-wanted/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>All I can say is don't give up and don't see it as the be all end all.
It took me several years to complete and submit the PPC forms- simply because I did not take the time out to sit there and do the job properly.  Since then I have been offered one Development Day which I was unable to attend nearly a year ago and am still waiting for the next.
BUT- it has worked out for the best for me.  Going through the PPC form, talking to others, gave me an invaluable insight in to the party etc- and I thought I knew it well.  By not getting diverted on General Election Day I was able to stand for a County seat- and win- by 10 votes!  If I had been distracted by being a PPC somewhere else I don't know if I would have won...
Now I am a County Councillor, Police Authority Member and about to Chair my first Topic Group while facing District Council elections.
That's more experience which means when I do PPC I'll be in a far better position.
So don't give up- and look at all the opportunities in the party!
(Also a member of the EMETF and UNISON Black Members National SOC).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is don&#8217;t give up and don&#8217;t see it as the be all end all.<br />
It took me several years to complete and submit the PPC forms- simply because I did not take the time out to sit there and do the job properly.  Since then I have been offered one Development Day which I was unable to attend nearly a year ago and am still waiting for the next.<br />
BUT- it has worked out for the best for me.  Going through the PPC form, talking to others, gave me an invaluable insight in to the party etc- and I thought I knew it well.  By not getting diverted on General Election Day I was able to stand for a County seat- and win- by 10 votes!  If I had been distracted by being a PPC somewhere else I don&#8217;t know if I would have won&#8230;<br />
Now I am a County Councillor, Police Authority Member and about to Chair my first Topic Group while facing District Council elections.<br />
That&#8217;s more experience which means when I do PPC I&#8217;ll be in a far better position.<br />
So don&#8217;t give up- and look at all the opportunities in the party!<br />
(Also a member of the EMETF and UNISON Black Members National SOC).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your views wanted! by Stephen Glenn</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/your-views-wanted/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/your-views-wanted/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>I was initially only licenced to be a candidate in the 2005 General Election but have since gone through the approval system. 

During my policy interview at my licencing I was asked about one element of Scottish Policy which I had spoken against at the debate at conference  the previous year. However, the policy was accepted by a democratic vote as was part of Scottish policy. So I'd prepared my respnse to such a question and indeed to any follow up, as my speech had actually been shown live on BBC Scotland that day. However, as Andy said above as it was the detail and not the principle that I had objected to in that policy debate and I was able to bring those elements out in my answer.

The thing is the exercises you have to prepare for to get approved are things that a candidate really has to go through to a greater of lesser extent depending on the constiuency and your profile in that race. Having now observed up close my second by-election and a key seat campaign in the general election since I have seen how this is good grounding in the skills that you require. The assessors are not so much trying to catch you out as test you to the limit. If you are going to be a candidate and more if you get elected and become an MP you have to be up to challenge.

Sadly my  group was 100% white and 75% male. I know this is not reflective of the talent that we have out there. 

As for what to do ask other's out there who have gone through it what to expect. When filling out the form think outside the box if you feel you do not have qualities in any area. You may have some life experience which meets a criteria in a certain way which you just take as being normal everyday but is just the sort of thing that is needed.

To acheive the Reflecting Britain we need a bigger pool and good female and ethnic candidates. In fact I know there are many out there who are hiding their lights under bushels and if they put themsleves forward they would beat many of the white men without breaking a sweat. However, most of all  go for it, relax and enjoy yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was initially only licenced to be a candidate in the 2005 General Election but have since gone through the approval system. </p>
<p>During my policy interview at my licencing I was asked about one element of Scottish Policy which I had spoken against at the debate at conference  the previous year. However, the policy was accepted by a democratic vote as was part of Scottish policy. So I&#8217;d prepared my respnse to such a question and indeed to any follow up, as my speech had actually been shown live on BBC Scotland that day. However, as Andy said above as it was the detail and not the principle that I had objected to in that policy debate and I was able to bring those elements out in my answer.</p>
<p>The thing is the exercises you have to prepare for to get approved are things that a candidate really has to go through to a greater of lesser extent depending on the constiuency and your profile in that race. Having now observed up close my second by-election and a key seat campaign in the general election since I have seen how this is good grounding in the skills that you require. The assessors are not so much trying to catch you out as test you to the limit. If you are going to be a candidate and more if you get elected and become an MP you have to be up to challenge.</p>
<p>Sadly my  group was 100% white and 75% male. I know this is not reflective of the talent that we have out there. </p>
<p>As for what to do ask other&#8217;s out there who have gone through it what to expect. When filling out the form think outside the box if you feel you do not have qualities in any area. You may have some life experience which meets a criteria in a certain way which you just take as being normal everyday but is just the sort of thing that is needed.</p>
<p>To acheive the Reflecting Britain we need a bigger pool and good female and ethnic candidates. In fact I know there are many out there who are hiding their lights under bushels and if they put themsleves forward they would beat many of the white men without breaking a sweat. However, most of all  go for it, relax and enjoy yourself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Glad to have you on board, Steve! by James Graham</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/welcome-steve-guy/#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/welcome-steve-guy/#comment-24</guid>
					<description>We're keen to have as many people to sign up as possible.  Just because you are white, male and middle-class, it doesn't mean you can't be part of the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re keen to have as many people to sign up as possible.  Just because you are white, male and middle-class, it doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t be part of the solution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your views wanted! by Linda Jack</title>
		<link>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/your-views-wanted/#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reflectingbritain.org.uk/2006/02/02/your-views-wanted/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>I thoroughly enjoyed selection day, tho I have to admit I was astounded to get thru. Question..............whats LibDem agricultural policy.......Answer.......I don't know but I think...dedadedee.........thats about our policy (phew!) As a woman, who has not only previously been married to a Sri Lankan, thus being blessed with two beautiful dual heritage children, but has spent most of my life as a youth worker in diverse communities, I know that what we see is what we get! It worries me that the party seems to be controlled by the great and the good. I'm not very great and certainly not very good............I don't look like you are supposed to look. At Meeting the Challenge it was a disgrace that we were addressed by white middle aged men all flippin day! (That is not to dis white middle aged men, its just that they are disproportionately represented) So, I would encourage you all. I stood for council having spent some time as a Unison Branch Secretary, negotiating with numpty County Councillors who didn't know their ...............from their elbow. So, who ever you are, you have something to offer, we live in a society governed by packaging, for me its far more important to know where your heart is. Its not about Oxbridge degrees, its about wisdom, compassion and a commitment to ensuring that EVERYONE has a stake in our increasingly divided society. So.........whoever you are......go get em!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thoroughly enjoyed selection day, tho I have to admit I was astounded to get thru. Question&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..whats LibDem agricultural policy&#8230;&#8230;.Answer&#8230;&#8230;.I don&#8217;t know but I think&#8230;dedadedee&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;thats about our policy (phew!) As a woman, who has not only previously been married to a Sri Lankan, thus being blessed with two beautiful dual heritage children, but has spent most of my life as a youth worker in diverse communities, I know that what we see is what we get! It worries me that the party seems to be controlled by the great and the good. I&#8217;m not very great and certainly not very good&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;I don&#8217;t look like you are supposed to look. At Meeting the Challenge it was a disgrace that we were addressed by white middle aged men all flippin day! (That is not to dis white middle aged men, its just that they are disproportionately represented) So, I would encourage you all. I stood for council having spent some time as a Unison Branch Secretary, negotiating with numpty County Councillors who didn&#8217;t know their &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;from their elbow. So, who ever you are, you have something to offer, we live in a society governed by packaging, for me its far more important to know where your heart is. Its not about Oxbridge degrees, its about wisdom, compassion and a commitment to ensuring that EVERYONE has a stake in our increasingly divided society. So&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;whoever you are&#8230;&#8230;go get em!!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
